To the moon......and beyond!
I'm not sure what to make of it.
Obviously its an election-year stunt, but could it happen? Bush wants NASA to go back to the moon, first with robotic vehicles by 2008, then with humans by 2015 or no later than 2020. From there, on to Mars.
The critics think the same - election year stunt. They also ask about where the money is going to come from. Bush reckons he only needs and extra $1bn over the next 5 years - the rest will come from the current NASA budget allocations.

Erm.
Well.

Hooray! I'm all for it, IF it actually happens. Hell we went to the moon over 30 years ago and haven't sent anyone further than 400 miles since then. That's the distance from here to Vegas. We could drive further than we've sent astronauts in the last 30 years, in 7 hours......

(this still doesn't mean I think Bush is any good)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The non-separation of the LDS church and Utah state.

Look - I understand that mormons think gays are somehow evil, subhumans. I understand that the LDS won't tolerate gays, doesn't like them and thus won't marry them. But for local government to overturn a supreme court ruling about gay marriage is taking it too far. This is religious persecution on a par with the dark ages. The church doesn't like gays, so it leans on its members in government to do everything possible to prevent them from having the basic rights afforded other couples who want to marry. In other words, the LDS church is forcing it's (wrong) opinion about the LGBT community on everyone, via state and local laws that it has had passed and enforced on its behalf. Why should non-religious people be forced to abide by the opinion of a religious cult that they have no affiliation with? Apart from anything else, the uber-conservatives in this state are always the first ones to bitch when something even slightly unconstitutional happens, yet here they are r
Read more

Employees don't want much

I'm sitting looking at my company's internal 'learning' system this morning - hundreds of online courses that are available to all employees, some of which we're mandated to take. I'm not sure why the rest of them exist. We certainly don't have time to do any of the courses, and for the average employee, they hold no relevance to what we do, or want to do in our day-to-day jobs. I for one just want to be assigned tasks, and then be left alone. I don't need to do hazardous material training - my job doesn't involve hazardous materials. I don't need micromanagement. I don't need all the various efficiency and ethics courses that are available because I have common sense. I don't need to be instructed how to use the email system, nor how 'just in time' manufacturing is good for the company (it has no bearing on our division). Ok I understand all of this is corporate C-Y-A but so many of these things are just inconsequential to us. On
Read more